What would we do without you

I still don’t know if I’m writing because I like it or because it’s one way to financial income. That’s why I started anyway, the latter. You might as well read my bio, if you want to find out how I started on this writing stuff. More like typing, I barely write anything with pen and paper now, and it’s definitely the more numerical stuff.

But you know what, all these bots that write content to trigger SEO metrics, they’re doing fine… it’s a numbers game to them. Just earlier a video on some Indian paparazzi found me: they mentioned uploading 100 posts a day to get the algorithm going. Churning views en masse is a skill to respect. Its success is quite surprising to me, as it’s an overstimulating quantity of content.

The reverse could potentially be as effective. Think about one of Newton’s laws of motion: equal and opposite reaction. This is a fundamental principle of the universe, and it applies to the metaphysical as well. Those adhering to the religion of science may not be there yet. But real scientists know what’s up. Anyway, we named this stuff after Newton, but people have been knowing about it for a long time.

What would the reverse be, to posting tons of content daily to create overstimulation and omnipresence in the eye of the viewer? It would be creating a high quality piece of content only sometimes, or less than sometimes. I just now realise the level of arrogance one must indulge in to even say these things. The thing is, do something too rarely and it’s still mooing. We do want the words to come to life, but we also want to eat them with our brains, while they’re still tender and juicy. That analogy is not the most coherent and even I am struggling to join it, but what I mean is this. If I write too little, I’ll never improve the skill, it will atrophy and forget about high quality. It will be as mediocre as the content spam.

Now this just came to mind. Is content spam really mediocre? Quantity in a way is also a quality. The thing about paparazzi stuff, is that they find scoops and little things that people get interested in. Like Kim Kardashian being seen wearing a green vest instead of a black one. Small details, and small details come in great quantities. In essence, to be a paparazzi dedicated to the craft, it’s of utmost importance to share as much as you can find of the differences between two grains of sand. That’s the quality aspect. And also, for them to not spam content, it would be an offense to their industry. If a paparazzi reads this, let me know if this analysis is correct.

Lastly, I want to mention this briefly. Let’s talk about a video I watched this morning. Left and write you will find the hoe, but only rare is the sophisticated hoe. Losers will follow, but only sophisticated losers the latter. LOL. This is what the video is about. Aella girl is some kind of social experimenter + hoe and she found incredibly interesting data following surveys on people. She wanted to see what the correlation between one’s fetish and political leaning was. Turns out there is strong correlation. But the part of the video that piqued me the most was at the end. When they mention a fetish emerging out of repression.

It’s fascinating that repression and inner hatred and imprisonment of certain emotions can cause a festering. That repression feeds the lust and manifests it into fetishes. If only we could read into other people’s lustful thoughts and see where they’re at. We can usually, because nowadays people are flexing their fetishes. They might as well, we are in those times after all. That’s why we couldn’t do it without you. You’re part of the happening. Creating the shit and exposing it. It’s not that simple to figure out who you are, but you ARE there, or here.. you are.